One might think that ‘after Communism’ is an uncomplicated idea, experience, or socio-political condition, but in the two countries of South-East Asia which I intend to discuss—namely, colonized, Muslim Indonesia, and uncolonized, Buddhist Thailand—‘after Communism’ has markedly different meanings, which therefore in turn affect the imaginary of contemporary radicalism. To set the stage, therefore, it is necessary to say something about the trajectory of Communism in each of the two countries.

The Netherlands East Indies was the first Asian ‘country’ outside the Soviet Union to have a Communist Party at all. The pki (Communist Party of Indonesia) was founded on 23 May 1920. In the relatively ‘liberal’ climate of the immediate post-World War I era, it developed rapidly, especially among estate labourers, dockers and railway personnel. As there were then no universities in the colony, and very few natives had gone to Holland for tertiary education, its leaders were a mix of Indonesian autodidacts and junior highschool graduates, along with a sprinkling of Dutch radicals, whom however the colonial regime quickly jailed or extruded. Although the young Party leaders frequently quarrelled with various Muslim political notables, the Party had no difficulty in cultivating a following among the Muslim masses, and it was in two of the most Muslim provinces of the colony that the Party’s millenarian call for an uprising in 1926–27 was most courageously, if disastrously, answered. The Dutch crushed the insurrection without much difficulty, executing some leaders, and banishing or imprisoning many others. For the remainder of the colonial period the Party did not seriously exist. It did not start to rebuild itself until after the outbreak of what Indonesians remember as their ‘Revolution of 1945’, when, between the collapse of the Japanese occupation regime, and the delayed return of the Dutch, an infant Republic of Indonesia was born. During the bitter struggle that ensued till late 1949, when The Hague finally conceded the transfer of sovereignty, freed, returning and newborn Communists played a significant but never a dominating political role.

Already, however, a difference in generations was visible. Many of the older generation were quite fluent in Dutch—some had even served in the anti-Nazi underground in Holland itself; they had travelled abroad, or been exiled there, and selfconsciously saw themselves as part of a world revolutionary movement; many had European friends and sometimes wives and lovers; they worked closely with progressive local Chinese; and they were by experience ‘activists’, above and below ground, trade-unionists, propagandists, strike organizers, and occasionally ‘terrorists’. They had no experience of parliamentary, legal politics. The second generation came to adulthood during the bloody Japanese occupation; their Dutch was usually minimal, they had never been abroad, and they had no foreign friends; they were not fond of Chinese (so that when they took control of the Party in 1951 they excluded Chinese from open Party membership); they were ardent nationalists, and also Party men and women first and foremost, because they entered politics under the infant Republic which governed itself as best it could by a regime of parliamentary institutions and political parties with their various affiliates.

About halfway through the Revolution, the Cold War set in with a vengeance, and increasingly polarized the internal politics of the Republic. The outcome was a brief but very bloody civil war on Java in the autumn of 1948 in which the Left, branded by a Muslim-dominated government as the traitorous agent of Moscow, was ruthlessly crushed. Many older leaders were executed or murdered, and more would have been had not the Dutch in December made a last, large military effort to suppress the Republic. A good number of second-generation Communists escaped from jail and joined the short guerrilla struggle if only in a marginal capacity. When the fighting ended and a liberal-democratic Republic covering all of Indonesia was formed in the last days of 1949, this generation emerged to take over and rebuild the Party’s membership and reputation.

In this endeavour they were astonishingly successful, for reasons that are too complex to go into here. Suffice it to say that already in the 1955 general elections, the only free elections Indonesia has ever had, the Party emerged as one of the Big Four, with millions of voters behind it and a large parliamentary fraction to represent it at the centre of governance. One of the key conditions of the Party’s electoral success was its extreme caution on domestic issues, and its strong nationalist stance externally, which enabled it to work out effective alliances with other political parties, and to begin to live down the ‘treason’ of 1948. While in practice the Party’s electoral successes committed it to peaceful, legal parliamentary politics, more or less like those of Togliatti’s pci, it could not bring itself publicly to say so; hence when in 1959 the Left-leaning President Sukarno and the generally rightwing army leaders cooperated to replace constitutional democracy with the authoritarian, populist-nationalist system of Guided Democracy, in which no elections would ever be held, the Party leaders felt they had no alternative but to go along.