Gregor McLennan says he is replying to my article on ‘Eurocentrism and its Avatars’. It seems to me what he is doing is taking off from my article to criticize ‘post-colonial theorists’, who are also characterized as ‘maximal anti-Eurocentrics’. The justification seems to be that ‘in places Wallerstein seems to agree’ with them. I leave the real targets to make their own reply if they wish. I shall restrict myself to clarifying my own position.
Back to issue
I/231•Sept/Oct 1998
NLR I/231, September–October 1998
Back to issue
I/231•Sept/Oct 1998By this author
- ‘Structural Crises’
- ‘Reading Fanon in the 21st Century’
- ‘The Curve of American Power’
- ‘Entering Global Anarchy’
- ‘New Revolts Against the System’
- ‘The 'Crisis of the Seventeenth Century'’
- ‘Eurocentricism and its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science’
- ‘The Agonies of Liberalism: What Hope Progress?’
- ‘The Bourgeois(ie) as Concept and Reality’
Related articles
Cite
Immanuel Wallerstein, ‘Questioning Eurocentricism: A Reply to Gregor McLennan’, NLR I/231, September–October 1998
DOI: doi.org/10.64590/6dc