PERMANENT RED a collection of “essays in seeing” on painting and sculpture by John Berger. by Michael Armstrong
Permanent Red is a collection of essays and reviews on art which reveal John Berger in his characteristic strengths. It cannot be said too often: he is far and away the best art critic today. He combines a fully developed seriousness about art with a remarkable gift for recreating in words the visual effects of the works of art he is discussing. Moreover, his judgments are always made within a framework of social and aesthetic references which he is never afraid to make absolutely clear. He is perceptive, both about painters whom he likes and those whom he does not like: but the particular insights are always related to what can only be described as a coherent aesthetic. As with other great critics, both of art and literature, the very coherence of his point of view is both his strength and his limitation. This recent collection of his work discusses a wide variety of problems. I want to take up and discuss one of these in this article.
All painting and all sculpture, Berger believes, must, in order to have value, contain some “precise, hopeful reference to the objective world”. Abstract art contains no such references; therefore it is, finally, valueless, except as pure design. It is not, he argues, that subtlety and excitement of form can only come through close, painstaking observation of the objective world. Berger is prepared to admire the formal beauty and vigour of works which he believes have no reference point in reality. Form and content, in works of abstract art, are separable. A formally magnificent work may, in theory, be worthless as art, except as decoration.
The root of his rejection of abstract art is, ultimately, related to his humanism and his Marxism: