talal saad: What happened in July 1970 was not unexpected; it was the result of a long-term plan, drawn up by British imperialism to contain, and then liquidate, the prevailing revolutionary trend. In this sense, the overthrow of Said bin Taimur was part of a double plan. First there was the plan for a so-called ‘Omani constitutional monarchy’; this had long been advocated by Tariq bin Taimur, Said’s brother. The second plan was obviously that of the Union of Arab Emirates. Both were political fronts for British neo-colonialism in the area, in a desperate attempt to advance seemingly patriotic régimes. There were two major reasons why the British were driven to replace Said by his son. The first was the success achieved by the revolution in Dhofar; this had begun to constitute a serious threat to the interests of imperialism in the whole area. In contrast, the reactionary régime of Said bin Taimur had become incapable of coping with the rising tide of revolution in Dhofar. A second equally important cause was the beginning of armed struggle in Oman proper under the leadership of the National Democratic Front for the Liberation of Oman and the Arab Gulf. After Said’s replacement, the British tried to undermine the revolution by a series of so-called reforms. In Salala itself, and in the plain around Salala, one or two clinics were opened, and some land was reclaimed. But in the mountains controlled by the Front British imperialism was unable to
talal saad: There is an overall concentrated plan to liquidate the revolution throughout the Gulf, and all the forces of reaction in the area have been working in this direction. This plan is been carried out as follows. First, Saudi Arabia is arming and financing mercenaries and these forces, together with Saudi Arabia’s own army, are making constant raids into the fifth and sixth provinces of the People’s Democratic Republic of Yemen. The aim of this is to liquidate the revolutionary régime in South Yemen and to deprive the revolution in the Gulf of its secure base. In addition, there has been constant bombing of the region around Hauf, the South Yemeni village on the borders of Dhofar, and of the track that links South Yemen to the front lines of the Dhofari revolution, and which crosses the western sector of the liberated areas.
said seif: The most important thing to say about Imam Ghalib’s movement is that it represented a clash within the imperialist camp. It was a conflict between the Imam and Said bin Taimur, i.e. a conflict between an absolute régime and a caricature of that obsolete régime, represented by the Imam himself. When we say that it is a conflict within the imperialist camp, we mean that behind Said bin Taimur and Imam Ghalib were Britain on the one hand and America and Saudi Arabia on the other. However, although the Imam’s movement represented a clash within the imperialist camp, it did have sizeable mass support; the masses who supported the Imam supported him mainly as a patriotic reaction to the British occupation of the interior of Oman in 1954.
As for the events of June 1970, it was clear by then that Britain was depending on an obsolete régime that was increasingly in contradiction with social and economic developments in the Gulf as a whole.
June 1970 was an embodiment and an extension of the policies of the Popular Revolutionary Movement. Towards the beginning of 1969 this organization decided that the best way to drive imperialism from the Gulf was to hit at its weakest point, the Omani interiori. The Popular Revolutionary Movement therefore created the National Democratic Front for the Liberation of Oman and the Arab Gulf to lead armed struggle in Oman. The Front considered its struggle to be an extension of the armed struggle already being waged in Dhofar. On June 12th, 1970 the Front launched a set of raids and attacks against government military posts in the Green Mountain area; there were political links with the peasants and shepherds of the area and the basic tactic was to create a revolutionary foco on the mountain. This widescale military operation led to a series of arrests, many of which were the result of mistakes committed by militants of the Front itself. The most important of these was that many chose to remain in Matrah, a coastal city where it is very difficult to find refuge or to make a retreat.