The us Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders spoke the unspeakable at a press conference on 8 December 1993. She courageously suggested that the government look at the experience of countries that had decriminalized drugs. She said it was her understanding that in other countries the crime rate and the incidence of drug abuse had actually declined with legalization. The White House was apoplectic and dismissed the idea out of hand. The administration’s disavowals came faster than planes flying cocaine from Venezuela to Miami: under no circumstances would there be such an inquiry.
The response of the administration is particularly unfortunate since the Surgeon General’s proposal was not to legalize drugs, as the American press erroneously reported. She proposed only that we look at the facts to see if the experience of other countries might provide a clue to a better approach than the us ‘war on drugs’ which almost everyone, including the Attorney General Janet Reno, acknowledges has been a complete and utter failure. The ineffectiveness and absurdity of putting so many people in prison for drug offences has led police chiefs, prison wardens, big-city mayors and even some conservative politicians and pundits including William Buckley, former Secretary of State George Schultz and Nobel economist Milton Friedman, to speak out in favour of decriminalization. Judges, under legal prescription to sentence drug offenders to long-term mandatory sentences, recognize the injustice and folly of the system and often refuse to impose the sentences.footnote1 On the other hand, drug offenders are sentenced without the possibility of parole which means they actually spend more time in prison than more serious, even violent, offenders.
As a consequence of the ‘war on drugs’ the prisons and jails of the country are overflowing. Between 1980 and 1992 the prison population in the United States more than doubled. Compared to other
Drug arrests and convictions are a major contributor to the extraordinary incarceration rate of the United States. In 1992 there were 1,066,400 arrests for drug-abuse violations reported to the fbi.footnote2 Drug arrests were the third most frequent category of arrests, behind larceny (1,504,500) and driving under the influence (1,624,500). Over two-thirds (68 per cent) of the drug arrests in 1992 were for possession and less than one-third (32 per cent) for the sale or manufacture of drugs. Marijuana arrests accounted for 32 per cent of the total, heroin and cocaine for 53 per cent; the remainder of the drug arrests were for synthetic or ‘other dangerous drugs’.footnote3 In 1992, 58 per cent of the inmates in federal prisons and over 30 per cent of state prisoners were sentenced for drug offences.footnote4 Approximately one-third of these are sentenced for marijuana and other drugs, two-thirds for heroin and cocaine: official reports make no distinction between these two but it is certain that the vast bulk of these arrests are for cocaine. Over 21 per cent of all federal prisoners are ‘low-level drug offenders with no current or prior violent offences on their records, no involvement in sophisticated criminal activity and no previous prison time’.footnote5 Austin and Irwin estimate that over 50 per cent of the prisoners in state
Were the Surgeon General’s recommendation followed and a study conducted the findings most certainly would suggest the necessity for a major shift in policy. The Netherlands has been a leader in the search for alternatives to policing as a solution to social problems associated with the use of drugs.footnote7 Their solution has been to decriminalize the use and sale of marijuana and to decriminalize de facto the possession and sale of small amounts of other drugs. Marijuana and hashish can be purchased in over two thousand coffee shops which