In the recent literature on gender relations in Eastern Europe, it is quite often said that democratization has ‘opened up a space’ within which women can now seek to identify their interests and organize.footnote1 That is undoubtedly the case. At the same time, however, as offering a space to women, the transition to liberal capitalism offers men the opportunity of putting a greatly increased social distance between themselves and women. It is the rise in masculinism which is the primary characteristic of gender relations in Eastern Europe today. If we grasp this, I argue, we also grasp the opportunity to more fully apprehend the way in which masculinism forms the very bedrock of Western liberal democracy. For Eastern Europe makes plain that the gender order of liberal capitalism is not simply the result of historical contingency. It cannot, for example, be explained in terms of women’s lesser experience or expertise with respect to the functioning of democratic institutions or the market. Indeed, the very uniformity of the Eastern European experience indicates that the re-creation of the gender order in the transition to capitalism is in fact predicated on the rescinding of a range of rights accorded to women under state socialism.
Under state socialism, the lack of civil society and private property had an ambivalent significance for gender relations. On the one hand, the constraints on the scope for autonomous public action which this entailed brought a substantial levelling of relations between women and men. This dimension of equality was further reinforced by the encoding of legal rights for women based on the assumption of full employment. On the other hand, the absence of civil society also fostered the neo-traditional organization of society, one aspect of which was the valorization and entrenchment of traditional definitions of gender.footnote2 It is the combined effect of these two sets of influences that is responsible for the fact that in Eastern Europe, deep-seated notions of gender difference often go hand in hand with a lack of any real sense of gender inequality.
Traditional views of what ‘normal’ men and women are, have, in fact, acted as a vehicle for change in Eastern Europe, ‘freedom’ being associated with the freedom to more fully enact a traditional feminine or
That the democratization of Eastern Europe should be tantamount to the selective political empowerment of men is evidenced by the outcomes of the democratic elections which have been held in the former Soviet bloc. These had the immediate effect of making all of the East European parliaments far more exclusively male institutions than had been the case previously. As the parliaments acquired a measure of real social power, so women were excluded. The greatest change in this respect has been witnessed in Romania. There, the 1990 elections saw a decrease in the percentage of female members of parliament from about one-third to 3.5 per cent.footnote4 In the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, there was a corresponding fall from 29.5 to 6 per cent; in Bulgaria the drop was from 21 to 8.5 per cent, in Hungary from 20.9 to 7 per cent and in the ex-gdr from 32.2 to 20.5 per cent.footnote5 Following the 1991 election in Poland, 44 out of a total of 460 members of parliament are women, roughly half the level of representation during state socialism.footnote6 The government formed after this election sacked the only two women ministers in post, as well as a number of female vice-ministers, leading one observer of the Polish Sejm to comment: ‘the liberal, European and modern Congress is reminiscent of an English club where only men are allowed to enter’.footnote7
Although men have swept into the democratic parliaments in force, their claim to rule is nevertheless a fragile one: it cannot be readily justified in terms of the superior experience, skills or qualifications of men, since the procedures of democracy are new and women have been at least the educational equals of men since the 1960s. Nor is political power yet founded on private property. Radical claims of gender difference are the sole basis for the legitimacy of the rule of men, and constitute an explicit justification of the exclusion of women