Tom Mertes on Thomas Frank, One Market Under God. The Robin Hood of anti-Cultural Studies leads a merry chase against market populism.
BAFFLER IN BOOMTOWN
What best characterized the politics and culture of the nineties in the world’s most powerful nation? Thomas Frank, editor of The Baffler—Chicago’s liveliest counter-cyclical journal—offers the most pungent reply to date. The title of One Market Under God is in its own way misleading. For Frank’s central argument is that in the last decades of the twentieth century, the United States saw two successive waves of populism, both equally remote from the insurgent traditions of Tom Watson or Robert LaFollette, but opposite in their relations with the deity. In the eighties, Reagan rode to power on a crest of ‘backlash’ populism, mobilizing white blue-collar workers, small businessmen, traditional farmers as a ‘moral majority’ pitted against a liberal establishment pilloried as decadent, irresponsible and elitist, scorning the values of order, family and religion. ‘Enunciated memorably in the speeches of Spiro Agnew and Clint Eastwood’, backlash populism ‘reminded “normal Americans” of the hideous world that the “establishment” had built, a place where blasphemous intellectuals violated the principles of Americanism at every opportunity, a place of busing and crime in the streets, of unimaginable cultural depravity, of epidemic disrespect for men in uniform, of judges gone soft on crime and politicians gone soft on communism’. For all its electoral success, however, this version of populism did not—and could not—celebrate the free market and business culture as exclusive arbiters of the good life: the Bible, the frontier, the family stood in the way.
’My institution subscribes to NLR, why can't I access this article?’
By the same author:
Crash of 1837
Tom Mertes on Alasdair Roberts, America’s First Great Depression. Political outcomes of economic crisis in the antebellum United States.
War, Crash, Slump
Tom Mertes on Liaquat Ahamed, Lords of Finance. Bestselling portrait of the interwar world’s central bankers as originators of the Great Depression—with edifying comparisons to their modern counterparts.
Tom Mertes on Jerry Hough, Changing Party Coalitions. Ethnic and confessional divisions as the origins of America’s political alignments, and the elite strategies that have culminated in today’s red–blue polarization.
Tom Mertes on Sean Wilentz, Andrew Jackson. A retouched portrait of the Democrat founding father—minus Indian massacres, slave exploitation and financial bubble.
A Republican Proletariat
Why did cultural bogeys trump economic distress as working-class voters went to the polls in the US? Can the case of Kansas stand in for proletarian America at large, as Thomas Frank suggests? Billionaire Democrats and blue-collar Republicans in the twisting shapes of the 21st-century political system.
Tom Mertes on Walden Bello, Deglobalization. Ideas of another world economy, less subject to the diktats of the imf and the straitjackets of the WTO.
Replying to Michael Hardt with an alternative look at Porto Alegre, Tom Mertes argues that while the variety of movements and forces in the WSF is not to be reduced to a single scale, the differences between them are less to do with organization than strategy.
Light from Florida
Tom Mertes on Richard Posner, Breaking the Deadlock. The first lucid analysis of the upshot of the US Presidential election, and its setting in the West’s most backward democracy.
On No Logo
Tom Mertes on Naomi Klein, No Logo. Emblems of ownership: from branding hides to clothes, cattle to people? A Canadian reporter’s stinging attack on the new corporate logic behind logo-mania.
Counsellor to Clinton
Tom Mertes on Dick Morris, The New Prince. America's fallen political adviser as a surrogate Machiavelli for the White House.