END OF THE NEOLIBERAL ERA?
Crisis and Restructuring in American Capitalism
During the severe economic crisis of 2008–09, it seemed to many that neoliberalism was finished.  Baris Guven provided valuable research assistance for the project that gave rise to this article. The major us banks were facing collapse and survived only through state bailouts. Economic activity plummeted, along with employment. According to conventional wisdom, none of this was supposed to be happening: free-market capitalism would be eternally stable, bringing an end to the era of state intervention in the economy. Everyone would swim or sink on the basis of their own efforts and abilities. These claims were belied by what then unfolded in clear view of the whole world. When the crisis that couldn’t happen broke out, the us Treasury and Federal Reserve swiftly jettisoned their free-market dogma and used all the mechanisms at their disposal to halt the collapse. Internationally, the major capitalist states of the G20 followed suit with fiscal-stimulus programmes, while their central banks flooded the economy with money and drove interest rates to near zero. Wags noted, ‘In a crisis, we are all Keynesians.’ There was an expectation in the air of looming change in institutions and policies, although working people were expected to rely on their own devices as Washington concentrated on saving bankers and giant corporations, while homeowners facing foreclosure got little help.
Subscribe for just £45 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3
- Dylan Riley: What Is Trump? The pitfalls of bad historical analogizing laid bare in ubiquitous attempts to pin a ‘fascist’ label on the 45th president. Instead, Riley argues, Trump is better grasped as an incoherent amalgam of Weberian forms of rule—ramshackle patrimonialism, weak charisma—operating like a foreign body inserted into America’s capitalist-bureaucratic state.