This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more information, see our privacy statement

New Left Review 35, September-October 2005


What, if any, agencies of political change exist today—and how should they be conceived? Tracing the long tradition of contrasts between a ‘people’ and a ‘multitude’, Malcolm Bull argues that the differing resolutions of them by Hobbes and Spinoza have descended to the twenty-first century, issuing into a contemporary stand-off between market globalization and populist reactions to it.

MALCOLM BULL

THE LIMITS OF MULTITUDE

How can a blind multitude, which often does not know what it wants . . . undertake so vast and difficult an enterprise as a system of legislation?
Rousseau, The Social Contract

The worst of all the multitude
Did something for the common good
Mandeville, The Grumbling Hive

Subscribe for just £35 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3

Username:

Malcolm Bull, ‘The Limits of Multitude’, NLR 35: £3
Password:
 



If you want to create a new NLR account please register here

’My institution subscribes to NLR, why can't I access this article?’

Download a PDF file


See the contents of NLR 35


Buy a copy of NLR 35


subscriptions


(hide)

If you are having trouble with the NLR website, please provide details here, and we will try to improve the site accordingly.

What were you trying to do?

What went wrong?

Your email address:

Security question: To help us avoid this form being used by automated spammers, enter the name of this journal.