This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more information, see our privacy statement

New Left Review 35, September-October 2005


What, if any, agencies of political change exist today—and how should they be conceived? Tracing the long tradition of contrasts between a ‘people’ and a ‘multitude’, Malcolm Bull argues that the differing resolutions of them by Hobbes and Spinoza have descended to the twenty-first century, issuing into a contemporary stand-off between market globalization and populist reactions to it.

MALCOLM BULL

THE LIMITS OF MULTITUDE

How can a blind multitude, which often does not know what it wants . . . undertake so vast and difficult an enterprise as a system of legislation?
Rousseau, The Social Contract

The worst of all the multitude
Did something for the common good
Mandeville, The Grumbling Hive

Subscribe for just £36 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3

Username:

Malcolm Bull, ‘The Limits of Multitude’, NLR 35: £3
Password:
 



If you want to create a new NLR account please register here

’My institution subscribes to NLR, why can't I access this article?’

Download a PDF file


See the contents of NLR 35


Buy a copy of NLR 35


Subscriptions