If you are having trouble with the NLR website, please provide details here, and we will try to improve the site accordingly.
LEO PANITCH and SAM GINDIN
SUPERINTENDING GLOBAL CAPITAL
As if taking too literally the maxim that Minerva’s owl flies at twilight, it seems that the imperial nature of the American state is belatedly being acknowledged today only to announce its imminent demise—the ‘unravelling’ of us hegemony.  See Giovanni Arrighi, ‘Hegemony Unravelling—i’, nlr 32, March–April 2005 and ‘Hegemony Unravelling—ii’, nlr 33, May–June 2005. See also David Harvey, The New Imperialism, Oxford 2003. In these accounts, the military occupation of Iraq is often seen as a desperate attempt to re-impose a faltering us leadership by force of arms. What these analyses tend to ignore is the unique scope and scale of the us imperialist state, and the specific role it has played in the making of the world economy in the postwar period. An evaluation of the us’s continuing capacity to shape global capitalism in the 21st century therefore requires some theorization of the imperialist state itself.  This essay builds on our previous work, both in these pages (‘The New Imperial State’, nlr 2, March–April 2000) and in the Socialist Register: see ‘Global Capitalism and American Empire’ in The New Imperial Challenge: Socialist Register 2004; and ‘Finance and American Empire’ in The Empire Reloaded: Socialist Register 2005.
Subscribe for just £36 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3