This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more information, see our privacy statement

New Left Review I/84, March-April 1974


Hans Magnus Enzensberger

A Critique of Political Ecology

As a scientific discipline, ecology is almost exactly a hundred years old. The concept emerged for the first time in 1868 when the German biologist, Ernst Haeckel, in his Natural History of Creation, proposed giving this name to a sub-discipline of zoology—one which would investigate the totality of relationships between an animal species and its inorganic and organic environment. Compared with the present state of ecology, such a proposal suggests a comparatively modest programme. Yet none of the restrictions contained in it proved to be tenable: neither the preference given to animal species over plant species, nor to macroas opposed to micro-organisms. With the discovery of whole ecosystems, the perspective which Haeckel had had in mind became redundant. Instead there emerged the concept of mutual dependence and of a balance between all the inhabitants of an ecosystem, and in the course of this development the range and complexity of the new discipline have grown rapidly. Ecology became as controversial as it is today only when it decided to include a very particular species of animal in its researches—man. While this step brought ecology unheard of publicity it also precipitated it into a crisis about its validity and methodology, the end of which is not yet in sight.

Subscribe for just £35 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3

Username:

Hans Magnus Enzensberger, ‘A Critique of Political Ecology’, NLR I/84: £3
Password:
 



If you want to create a new NLR account please register here

’My institution subscribes to NLR, why can't I access this article?’

Download a PDF file


See the contents of NLR I/84


Buy a copy of NLR I/84


subscriptions


(hide)

If you are having trouble with the NLR website, please provide details here, and we will try to improve the site accordingly.

What were you trying to do?

What went wrong?

Your email address:

Security question: To help us avoid this form being used by automated spammers, enter the name of this journal.