This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more information, see our privacy statement

New Left Review I/73, May-June 1972


Arghiri Emmanuel

White-Settler Colonialism and the Myth of Investment Imperialism

‘Financial’ imperialism is a fashionable term. It is supposed to be different in nature from the ‘mercantile’ imperialism of the 17th and 18th centuries, to have matured during the last quarter of the 19th century and to have led to the ‘informal’ and then the ‘formal’ take-over of the world, culminating in the sharing out of the last unoccupied territories—Africa, the Ottoman Middle East and Indochina. This theory has been put to severe trial recently. The huge colonial empires, which had taken centuries to build, broke up in a few years without proportionate violence and without any marked impoverishment of the great imperial parent states or any reduction in their capacity to exploit the rest of the world.

Subscribe for just £36 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3

Username:

Arghiri Emmanuel, ‘White-Settler Colonialism and the Myth of Investment Imperialism’, NLR I/73: £3
Password:
 



If you want to create a new NLR account please register here

’My institution subscribes to NLR, why can't I access this article?’

Download a PDF file


See the contents of NLR I/73


Buy a copy of NLR I/73


Subscriptions