Eurocentrism and its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science
Social science has been Eurocentric throughout its institutional history, which means since there have been departments teaching social science within university systems.  This was the keynote address at the isa East Asian Regional Colloquium, ‘The Future of Sociology in East Asia’, 22–23 November 1996, Seoul, Korea, co-sponsored by the Korean Sociological Association and International Sociological Association. This is not in the least surprising. Social science is a product of the modern world-system, and Eurocentrism is constitutive of the geoculture of the modern world. Furthermore, as an institutional structure, social science originated largely in Europe. We shall be using Europe here more as a cultural than as a cartographical expression; in this sense, in the discussion about the last two centuries, we are referring primarily and jointly to Western Europe and North America. The social science disciplines were in fact overwhelmingly located, at least up to 1945, in just five countries—France, Great Britain, Germany, Italy, and the United States. Even today, despite the global spread of social science as an activity, the large majority of social scientists world-wide remain Europeans. Social science emerged in response to European problems, at a point in history when Europe dominated the whole world-system. It was virtually inevitable that its choice of subject matter, its theorizing, its methodology, and its epistemology all reflected the constraints of the crucible within which it was born.
Subscribe for just £36 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3