If you are having trouble with the NLR website, please provide details here, and we will try to improve the site accordingly.
The Ecstasy of Philistinism
Believing that philistinism was not mere vulgarity but ‘the antithesis par excellence of aesthetic behaviour’, Adorno expressed interest in studying the phenomenon as a via negativa to the aesthetic.  T. W. Adorno, Aesthetic Theory, London 1984, p. 342, p. 454. But the project remained unrealized, and although he frequently made dismissive or insulting remarks about philistines, Adorno never bothered to investigate what, if anything, philistinism might be. In this respect, his attitude was characteristic of the discourse against philistinism that had been in circulation since the nineteenth century. But in his unfulfilled desire to study the philistine, Adorno opened the way to a revaluation of that tradition, for upon closer examination the philistine proves to be a figure of greater historical and intellectual importance than Adorno imagined.
Subscribe for just £36 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3
- Dave Beech, John Roberts: Tolerating Impurities: On Ontology, Genalogy and Defence of Philistinism
- Andrew Bowie: Confessions of a 'New Aeshete': A Response to the 'New Philistines'
- Julian Stallabrass: In and Out of Love with Damien Hirst
- Dave Beech, John Roberts: Spectres of the Aesthetic
- J. M. Bernstein: Against Voluptuous Bodies: Of Satiation Without Happiness