If you are having trouble with the NLR website, please provide details here, and we will try to improve the site accordingly.
Marxism or Post-Marxism?
Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe’s Hegemony and Socialist Strategy  and Norman Geras’s lengthy review article (‘Post-Marxism’, nlr 163) raise issues which are at the heart of the ongoing debate on the stature and prospects of contemporary Marxist theory. Laclau and Mouffe’s major thesis is that the core of all Marxist theory is based on a necessitarian, deterministic logic which emphasizes iron laws, a strict succession of stages, the inevitability of the proletarian revolution, and so on. This logic reduces complexity and leads to an essentialist view of the social and to a closed, monistic type of theoretical discourse. All attempts from Marx onwards to soften Marxism’s deterministic core by stressing indeterminacy, complexity, the importance of agency, the relative autonomy of the political etc. are simply ad hoc additions to a theoretical edifice which, in its foundations, remains irretrievably monistic. In other terms, when Marxists, past and present, try to avoid determinism, they unavoidably fall into the trap of ‘dualism’ or eclecticism. Therefore a deterministic closure of electicism/dualism is the grim dilemma of all Marxist theory.
Subscribe for just £35 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3