If you are having trouble with the NLR website, please provide details here, and we will try to improve the site accordingly.
Nicholas Abercrombie, Stephen Hill and Ryan S. Turner
Determinacy and Indeterminacy in the Theory of Ideology
The analysis of ideologies and forms of knowledge and belief is in a state of disorder. In contemporary Marxism, the autonomy and independent importance of ideology have been stressed at the expense of a discredited economic reductionism. In many ways this is a desirable development, although, as we have pointed out elsewhere,  N. Abercrombie, S. Hill, B. S. Turner, The Dominant Ideology Thesis, London 1980. it also carries with it some very misleading consequences. However, the critical problem that contemporary Marxist theories of ideology have to face is: how is one to reconcile materialism with the autonomy of ideology? This implies a second difficulty: namely, how is one to reconcile the notion of ideology as critique with a general theory of ideology? In terms of disciplinary definitions, there is a parallel question about the relationship of the Marxist theory of ideology to the sociology of knowledge which developed in opposition to classical Marxism.
Subscribe for just £36 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3