If you are having trouble with the NLR website, please provide details here, and we will try to improve the site accordingly.
The Idealism of American Criticism
From the mid-1930s to the late 1940s, American literary theory fell under the sway of a curious hybrid of critical technocracy and Southern religious-aesthetic conservatism known as the ‘New Criticism’.  Offspring of the failed Agrarian politics of the 1930s, and aided by the collapse of a Stalinised Marxist criticism, New Criticism yoked the ‘practical critical’ techniques of I. A. Richards and F. R. Leavis to the re-invention of the ‘aesthetic life’ of the old South in the delicate textures of the poem. Ravaged by scientific rationalism, the ‘world’s body’  had been shamefully denuded; it was now the task of criticism to restore that sensuous particularity, resisting the remorseless abstraction of experience with its cognitions of poetic ambiguity. But since a mere Romanticism was no longer ideologically plausible, New Criticism couched its nostalgic anti-scientism in toughly ‘objectivist’ terms: the poem had the gemlike hardness of an ‘urn’ or ‘icon’, a structure of complex tensions cut loose from the flux of history and authorial intention, autotelic and unparaphrasable. Critical analysis, then, mimed the reifying habits of industrial capitalism even as it resisted them; ‘disinterested’ aesthetic contemplation parodied the very scientism it was out to challenge. If the texture of the poem eluded rationalist enquiry, its functionalist structure held contradictions in harmonious balance. As a provisional unification of responses, an eirenic interplay of opposing beliefs, poetry promised to scoop out a contemplative space within the Cold War. In response to the reification of society, New Criticism triumphantly reified the poem.
Subscribe for just £35 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3