New Left Review 7, January-February 2001


Cosmopolitan ideals have a pedigree that needs to be traced by culturaltheory as well as political science. Can worldgovernment shake off its imperialist heritage, or does international solidarity still require the nation-state?

TIMOTHY BRENNAN

COSMOPOLITANISM AND INTERNATIONALISM

Daniele Archibugi opens his eloquent case for a ‘cosmopoliticaldemocracy’ with an important concession. The world’s major depositories of power, he observes, remain national states that have ‘only increased in the scale and scope of their dominion’, within an inter-state system. He is right. [1] But nation-states are a key to understanding our present world not simply because they intractably persist, but also because in significant ways their political valences have altered. Such states continue to represent, as they have always done, jurisdictional acts of enclosure designed to perpetuate class privileges over specified regions. Today, however, they are also the terrains on which new constituencies can work along varied axes of power. They are, in fact, the only effective structures for doing so. National states impose labour discipline on the working poor and adjudicate disputes among local elites. These have always been among their primary functions. But in the current phase of worldwide neo-liberalhegemony, they also offer a manageable (albeit top-heavy) site within which the working poor can make limited claims on power, and have at least some opportunity to affect the way they are ruled.



Subscribe for just £34 and get free access to the archive
Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3

Username:

Timothy Brennan, ‘Cosmopolitanism and Internationalism’, NLR 7: £3
Password:
 



If you want to create a new NLR account please register here

Also available in: Spanish