New Left Review 43, January-February 2007
GÖRAN THERBORN
AFTER DIALECTICS
Radical Social Theory in a Post-Communist World
If socialism and liberalism have both been central to modern political and social thought, during the 20th century it was socialism, in a loose ecumenical sense, that was the most successful of the two in terms of intellectual attraction and public support. [1] Socialism was emblazoned on the banners of mass parties in Brazil, Britain, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Africa—in fact, virtually every major country of the globe, with the exception of Nigeria and the us. It was embraced as a rhetorical goal, at least, by a range of locally powerful parties from Arctic Social Democrats to African nationalists. Socialism and Communism exercised a powerful attraction over some of the most brilliant minds of the 20th century: Einstein was a socialist, writing a founding manifesto for the American Marxist journal Monthly Review; Picasso was a Communist, who designed the logo of post-World War ii Communist-led peace movements. In spite of its conservatively defined original task and its own staunchly conservative traditions, the Swedish Academy has allotted the Nobel Prize for literature to a series of left-wing writers, from Romain Rolland to Elfriede Jelinek.
|
Subscribe for just £34 and get free access to the archive Please login on the left to read more or buy the article for £3 |
By the same author:
NATO's Demographer
Transcaucasian Triptych
A Liberal Provoked?
Capital's Twilight Zone
Into the 21st Century
Reconsidering Revolutions
The Limits of Social Democratic Admirableness
The Autobiography of the Twentieth Century
Dialectics of Modernity: On Critical Theory and the Legacy of Twentieth-Century Marxism
Reply to Mouzelis